Nursing Book Review
Amazon offers a consistent assortment of Nursing Study Guide as well as Reviews, and thus we rely on such foundations during research to facilitate the comprehensive writing of book reviews in nursing essays.
Before reading, it is essential to consider the following:
• Title – articulate on the suggestion
• Preface and Introduction – this is an excellent source of valuable information that replicates the author’s intention along with the scope of the book under review. Also, consider if any limitations have been recognized and if the writer ignored essential features in as far as the subject is concerned.
• Table of Contents – This is a good pointer of the book’s sequential arrangement considering the key ideas and their development topically or chronologically.
Points to anticipate while reading the whole book:
• What is the all-purpose field or genre? What is the value of the book?
• From what point of view is the book based?
• Do you agree or contest the writer’s perspective?
• Take notes as you continue in reading the book and pinpoint essential passages that can form part of quotations during the review.
• Are you in a position to comprehend the thesis that the author presents, “common thread”?
• What is the applicable style that the writer applies – is it formal or informal? Is this method appropriate to address the interest of the audience?
• Does the author accurately discuss the concepts? Is the language applied fathomable and convincing? Does the author develop the ideas logically? Which areas have efficiently been covered and which areas are scanty? Does the author have precision in information used?
• Do the conclusion and the summary convince the reader?
• Assuming that there are footnotes, do they reflect well the information given in the paper? Does the reference replicate the information provided in the body of the text?
• If you find it appropriate, make comments on the paper format that reflects such issues as the binding and the layout among others. Does the author make use of figures, maps, and illustrations and if yes, do you find them to be ingenious?
• In case an index is provided, is it correct? What type of references did the author apply, primary or secondary? Comment of important omissions.
• Are there any worthy accomplishments that can be attributed to the book? Is further research needed? Compare this book with other books that were written by the author and any other text discussing similar issues although written by different authors. Prioritize on the books in the reference list.
• Writing Outlook
• It must have a topic, writer’s name, the city it is published and by whom, time of publication, corrections made the quantity of pages, other characteristics as well as cost and ISBN.
• Capture the reader by your introduction. Create a theme in line with the shortened account of the book. Follow the set rules because some who correct the book may approve a short theme and some will not. Some individuals may like concrete, and clear reasons why a publication is recommended for a subject other may not be specific.
• Inspect the book you have gone through and not the one you speculate is authored by the same author.
• If the book stands amongst the rest, then endorse it giving motives behind your endorsement, if your approval is plain without reasons to specify it.
• Add writer’s information and what he or she is known for, his authorizations amongst other things that add value to the person of the writer.
• Have in mind the potential reader of the summarized outlook. Whether the author is the owner of a library who would like to restock or a parent who would want to select children’s book. The outlook must meet the demand of the potential reader.
• The outlook must end with a short highlight and a final review. No introduction of a new idea should be allowed here.
• A better view is possible when enough time is set aside